Tests: Normalized clock frequencies

We revisit our test for normalized clock frequencies. The goal is to run a number of tests with all processors at 2,9 GHz to see how they perform at the same clock frequency. This helps enthusiasts and overclockers to calculate how a specific processor will perform at a certain clock frequency compared to an other processor. The newly arrived processors in the test are obviously todays main show, the Core i7-3770K.

processorer

We run all the processors in their standard performance, this means that they are running with the same number of cores that they arrive with and on processors like the Intel Core i7-2600K and Core i3-21000 with HyperThreading switched on. We also run with turbo functions from both camps switched off to make sure that they processors stay at the predetermined clock frequencies.

The clock frequency we chose for a normalized base value was 2,9 GHz, this after the lowest denominator A8-3850 which has a clock frequency at exactly 2,9 GHz. The reason that we’re doing this is that we won’t have to overclock any model, which in turn overclocks other functions in the processor, and therefore might give unfair advantages against the other models. 

Processor Cores/Threads Clock frequency
Core i7-3960X 6/12 2,9 GHz
Core i7-980X 6/12 2,9 GHz
Core i7-3770K 4/8 2,9 GHz
Core i7-2600K 4/8 2,9 GHz
Core i7-2500K 4/4 2,9 GHz
Core i3-2100 2/4 2,9 GHz
FX-8150 8/8 2,9 GHz
Phenom II X6 1100T 6/6 2,9 GHz
Phenom II X4 980BE 4/4 2,9 GHz
Phenom II X2 565BE 2/2 2,9 GHz
Athlon II X4 635 4/4 2,9 GHz
Athlon II X3 455 3/3 2,9 GHz

We’ve chosen processors with architecture, cache memory and the number of cores in mind. That way we can cover what is relevant today from both AMD and Intel.

power2.9

cinebench2.9

winrar2.9

handbrake2.9

avp2.9

borderlands2.9

At normalized clock frequencies we still see that Ivy Bridge has an advantage over the previous generation Sandy Bridge, but with much lower margins. This is due to that we’ve turned off Turbo Boost, and at the same time we force all processors to be run at 2,9 GHz. The difference is still very noticeable, but it’s much lower than what we could see in our earlier tests.

9
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
9 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
tecnotronWILLENALDOpcpraise.comJacob HugossonTaki R Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
senaste äldsta flest röster
Notifiera vid
Marius
Medlem
Marius

Great review guys, i would really love to see you do much more of them =]

AlexCheveau
Gäst
AlexCheveau

A really great review, good job. Waiting to get my hands on it… but don’t know when it will arrive in Brazil

Andreas G
Medlem

Glad you liked it 🙂

We hope the new translators will have time for more of these.

Taki R
Gäst
Taki R

You used DDR3-1333 for AMD APU when it’s known that those processors need faster RAM to reach top performance, unlike Intel’s which don’t scale up accordingly. As it is, this is a very Intel-biased review.

pcpraise.com
Gäst

It seem Intel will beat AMD more with this line of new generation processor. It is faster and consume less power than sandy bridge and trinity. Core per core / clock per clock basis.
I really like to know though the performance and efficiency compare to AMD trinity.

WILLENALDO
Gäst
WILLENALDO

É realmente incrível todo esse progresso/evolução da INTEL.
BRASIL – CRATO – CEARÁ

WILLENALDO
Gäst
WILLENALDO

É realmente incrível todo esse progresso/evolução da INTEL.
BRASIL – CRATO – CEARÁ

tecnotron
Gäst
tecnotron

What happens if I put a 125w TDP CPU on a 95w motherboard? If I have a quad-core CPU and disable 2 cores will my CPU fit in the 95w TDP?